Posted: Dec 19, 2018
Statistical power analysis represents a cornerstone of rigorous experimental design, yet its full potential remains largely untapped in contemporary computational research practice. The conventional approach to power analysis has historically been relegated to sample size calculations during the planning phase, with limited integration throughout the experimental lifecycle. This research addresses the critical gap between theoretical power considerations and practical experimental implementation, proposing a novel framework that elevates power analysis from a preliminary checklist item to a dynamic, integral component of experimental design and execution. The fundamental challenge in modern computational experimentation lies in the increasing complexity of research questions, the high-dimensional nature of data, and the resource-intensive nature of many computational procedures. Traditional power analysis methods, developed primarily for simple experimental designs and parametric tests, struggle to accommodate the nuanced requirements of contemporary research in machine learning, computational biology, and data science. This limitation manifests in widespread underpowered studies, inflated Type II error rates, and ultimately, unreliable research findings that fail to replicate or generalize. Our investigation builds upon the premise that statistical power should not be viewed as a static property determined at the outset of an experiment, but rather as a dynamic characteristic that evolves throughout the research process.
Downloads: 34
Abstract Views: 2047
Rank: 366361