Posted: Sep 15, 2011
This research investigates the complex relationship between accounting standard convergence and multinational financial performance comparability through a novel computational framework that integrates natural language processing, network analysis, and machine learning techniques. Unlike traditional accounting research that primarily relies on statistical analysis of financial ratios, our approach develops a multi-dimensional comparability metric that captures both quantitative and qualitative aspects of financial reporting convergence. We analyze financial statements from 1,200 multinational corporations across 45 countries over a 15-year period spanning the transition from local GAAP to IFRS. Our methodology introduces three innovative components: a semantic similarity algorithm for disclosure comparability assessment, a network-based contagion model for standard adoption patterns, and a machine learning framework for predicting convergence outcomes. The results reveal that while quantitative convergence has improved significantly, qualitative comparability remains constrained by cultural, institutional, and implementation factors. We identify specific disclosure categories where divergence persists and develop a predictive model for convergence success factors. The findings challenge the assumption that formal standard adoption automatically translates to enhanced comparability and provide a new analytical framework for assessing international accounting harmonization. This research contributes to both accounting theory and computational social science by demonstrating how advanced computational methods can uncover nuanced patterns in regulatory convergence that traditional approaches might overlook.
Downloads: 18
Abstract Views: 1933
Rank: 413045