Posted: May 01, 2023
The relationship between earnings volatility and financial reporting quality represents a fundamental yet underexplored dimension of corporate finance and investment decision-making. Traditional financial research has largely treated earnings volatility as either a risk metric or a signal of operational instability, while financial reporting accuracy has been examined through the lens of accounting standards and audit quality. However, the dynamic interplay between these variables and their collective impact on investor confidence remains poorly understood. This research addresses this gap by introducing an innovative computational framework that integrates quantitative financial analysis with behavioral economics principles. Earnings volatility, defined as the standard deviation of a company's earnings over multiple reporting periods, has traditionally been viewed as an indicator of business risk and operational uncertainty. Conventional wisdom suggests that higher volatility correlates with reduced reporting accuracy and diminished investor confidence. However, our preliminary analysis indicates this relationship may be more nuanced, involving threshold effects and contextual factors that previous research has overlooked. The cognitive processes underlying investor decision-making in volatile earnings environments represent a critical area for investigation, particularly as financial markets become increasingly complex and data-driven. This study makes several original contributions to the literature. First, we develop a novel methodology that combines machine learning algorithms with behavioral experiments to capture the multidimensional nature of the earnings volatility-reporting accuracy-investor confidence relationship.
Downloads: 52
Abstract Views: 1985
Rank: 452709